Boy, is this a handy site (and a natural for LH): Linguist names.
How often does this come up? You encounter a name of a linguist that you need to say out loud, and you have no idea how to say it. The goal of this page is collect some names that have presented this sort of problem either for me or for other linguists.
People who are linked without comment have included IPA transcriptions of their name pronunciations on their websites. NB: If people pronounce your name differently from how you’d like it to be pronounced, or if you’ve ever been asked how to pronounce your name, that’s a hint that you should put that information on your website. It is more likely to reach the target audience if it’s on your site than on mine. Roman Jakobson–you’re off the hook on this one.
As I scrolled down, I kept thinking “Huh — I never would have guessed.” Who knew that William Labov says [ləbˈoʊv]? And I would have pronounced Katherine Demuth’s surname like the painter Charles (/dɪˈmuθ/) if it hadn’t been for Maria Gouskova informing me it was [dˈiməθ]. Gouskova modestly doesn’t include her own name on the list, but on her homepage she conveniently has it in both English ([məˈɹijə ɡuˈskoʊvə]) and Russian ([mˠaˈrʲijə ɡˠusʲˈkˠovˠə]) versions, with audio files. (Thanks, Y!)
In th olden days it was just Bopp and Rask, etc.
How handy! But does anybody have any idea what the difference between the two pronunciations of Trudgill is?
/dɡ/ versus /dʒ/
Wot, no Хомський?
(I tried ANC’s WP page, but in among the unadulterated hagiography it does not seem to give the pronunciation. I may be wrong: I couldn’t bear to look at it for long.)
It is not a human name, and to pronounce it correctly you would have to dive so deep into the Structure that you might never be sane again.
Is [o] different from both [oʊ] and [ɔ] ?
The list includes one of my own old teachers from undergraduate days (Semantics, fall 1985, in which I did poorly), but I am mildly amused that they felt the need to give IPA instructions for “Farkas” but not for her given name “Donka.” Who is the reader for whom “you know, the usual way to pronounce “Donka” is self-evident but who still needs help with the surname?
It doesn’t include Donca Steriade, whom I knew when we were both grad students. (Her name is pronounced exactly as you would expect for a Romanian.)
Hmm. Apparently Prof. Steriade graduated from the University of Bucharest one year ahead of Prof. Farkas, before they both emigrated to pursue Ph.D.’s and subsequent academic careers in the New World.
I’ve never been sure how to pronounce Marianne Mithun’s last name. I’ve seen two different ways, /ˈmɪθjun/ and Wikipedia (without sourcing) gives /mɪˈθuːn/.
I wrote Donca and she immediately responded and said she’d add herself to the list. The system works!
OK, but how do you pronounce ‘hat’?
I’ve never been sure how to pronounce Marianne Mithun’s last name. I’ve seen two different ways, /ˈmɪθjun/ and Wikipedia (without sourcing) gives /mɪˈθuːn/.
She was also at Yale while I was there, and I remember it as /mɪˈθuːn/. But you could write her and ask: https://www.linguistics.ucsb.edu/people/marianne-mithun
I read in the WiPe article on Donca Steriade that she edited a book called Phonetically Based Phonology. Though it be ignorant of me to ask: “on what else could phonology be based, if not on phonetics?”, I trust it is a pardonable ignorance.
It seems to be a collection of essays/articles mainly centred on Optimality Theory, one of the provinces of the Holy Chomskyan Empire. It traces its lineage back to that horrid book, The Sound Pattern of English.
I personally find OT annoying*, so I am not the best person to explain it. My bitterness is partly due to the fact that I have recently acquired Cahill’s Aspects of the Morphology and Phonology of Konni and am currently trying to mine it for actual data; this involves transposing a lot of stuff which Cahill has ingeniously shoehorned into the Approved Paradigm (the aforesaid Optimality Theory) back into a form which is actually usable for my (historical comparative linguistic) purposes. Happily there’s a lot of good data in there. Somewhere …
My heart sinks whenever I find a grammatical description entitled “Aspects of the X of Y”, but Cahill’s work is actually quite good. It’s just a pity he had to drink the OT Kool-Aid to get a PhD out of it all …
* Order those phonological rules! Order them, I say! Why won’t you just order the damn things? Why? They’re just imaginary, after all, anyway! Where’s the harm in ordering them, for Panini’s sake?
I did briefly wonder whether this might be one of those Chomsky things, you know, the improbable in full pursuit of the unintelligible.
I’m a little surprised that Israeli Roni Katzir’s name is written with an [r]. I’d expect the two r’s to be [ʀ].
Heh.
Optimality Theory right there!
“Optimality Theory” is too transparent of a name. They should have called it OᴘᴛT.
Ah. It’s an ingenious subversion. They’ve given a transparent name to a system specifically designed to introduce superfluous opacity. It’s a masterly touch. One can but admire …
@Y
It does say “the bias is towards anglicized pronunciations here”, so I would say it’s not surprising at all for [ʀ] not to be used in a transcription.
I was distracted by the (self-admittedly inconsistent) use of ɹ in a few names.
J. W. Brewer,
Your 11:18am comment brings back some memories. In 1976-77 I spent many pleasant hours filing foreign dissertations in the basement of the Center for Research Libraries in Chicago. The work itself was tedious, but undemanding, and Donka Farkas was my very amusing and knowledgeable co-worker, so we would chat about whatever we wanted while unwrapping packages and sorting disses for filing. Even after 40+ years I remember some of the things she said about living in Ceausescu-era Romania. For instance, as an illustration of the stupidity of the Communist authorities, or perhaps just bureaucracies in general, she said she had to get six separate signatures to gain access to the room where foreign periodicals were kept, but once she got her official permission, she could go there any time, for as long as she wanted, and read anything she wanted, e.g. Time magazine. If I remember correctly, she had to show that she needed a specific article in a western linguistics journal for her research, but my impression was that she may have designed the research to require that article, so she could get her super-library card.
I’m disappointed not to find Ladefoged. But perhaps that one’s obvious to linguists.
Gouskova says “the bias is towards anglicized pronunciations”, but anything with [ɾ] or [ɚ] indicates a bias towards Americanized ones.
Farkas: Well, I didn’t know. We don’t all know Hungarian orthography, and those of us who know a little might wonder if it’s [‘fɔkɒʃ] or something similar.
/ˈlædɪfoʊɡɪd/
It’s a double bluff …
Сочетание букв жч в фамилии Палажченко произносится как [щ][3]. Ударение делается на втором слоге, хотя носители английского языка часто делают ударение на третьем слоге. В англоязычной прессе встречается написание как Palazhchenko[4], так и Palazchenko[5].
Па́вел Русла́нович Пала́жченко
My point was not that the pronunciation of “Farkas” should be self-evident to everyone, but that many of those who could understandably use some guidance on that might quite reasonably also benefit from guidance on “Donka.” What’s the actual vowel in the first syllable? Should the natural Anglophone tendency to transform /n/ into /ŋ/ before /k/ be resisted or embraced? Etc. For all I know there could be a material difference between the default Hungarian pronunciation of the name and the default Romanian pronunciation (it’s apparently extant among both language communities), which would make the pronunciation used (or the pronunciation acquiesced in in the U.S. as the best you could reasonably expect from Anglophones, which is not exactly the same thing) by a Hungarianly-surnamed person who grew up in a Romanian-majority environment even harder to predict.
As shown by the spellings with c (as in Steriade) vs. k.
@juha
I thought your wikipedia footnote 3 was a Cyrillic capital z, making the name very difficult to pronounce 😊
I did too!
@rosie, Ladefoged has been treated on here a few times before. Since the man grew up in England, he pronounced his name as DE says. And Danes pronounce the name of 1474 people in Denmark totally differently.
(I assume his parents spoke Danish, if not among themselves then with relatives, so PL cannot have been unaware of that pronunciation. But that’s not relevant to his name).
From his text, Vowels and Consonants:
Trinful Spalindic is our best hope in these dark days. She’s got what it takes. I reckon she has the Calvinistic Socialist vote pretty much in the bag already.
[‘∫pa:ln̩dətʃ], by the way.
“Trinful” is just as usual for the girl’s name, apart from the stress.
The first two syllables, are in fact the same as the diminutive laddie.
He pronounces laddie with an /ɪ/ on the end, but I don’t! I don’t think happy-tensing is covered in this book.
Thanks, Y. That is clearly the English-based pronunciation that PT describes, the bit about Danish morphemes is a red herring. [l̤æ̘ː.ð̬ː.foː.ð̬] is what I’m willing to commit to today, I probably said something else last time this came up.
And it’s more like “barn foreman,” at that. Third in command on the estate after the owner and the hated reave proper (ridefoged).
@lars
How would the Danish national footballer Delany’s name be pronounced, e.g., by sports commentators?
Bah! Happy-tensing is for the followers of /tʃɔmskɪ/.
We follow the Way of the Ancestors, as revealed to us in Brief Encounter by the Blessed Celia.
Re foget, the German name is Vogt (or Voigt with “Dehnungs-i”) from Latin advocatus.
So they just dumped the Latin locative prefix?
However, by morphic resonance, avocado means “testicle.” Among other things.
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ahuacatl#Classical_Nahuatl
Or it doesn’t.
Huh. I trusted Frances Karttunen. I – well – I must say that I feel let down.
the German name is Vogt (or Voigt with “Dehnungs-i”
Just to avoid any confusion, both spellings are common for the last name, but for the noun (now mostly a historical title) only the first spelling is correct.
@hans, Y
I am sorry for not writing more earlier. re advocatus > Vogt, DWDS gives advocātus > Late Latin vocatus (this may have short a and may even have 1st syllable stress by internal (pre) Romance development-Etienne?) > AHD fogā̌t (here the 1st vowel might be long according to later reflexes, but these later reflexes might be due to parallel sound changes). You can probably see why I do not write more, I do not know enough to interpret my sources better than this.😊
“Aspects of the X of Y”
I’m rather partial to “Prolegomena to an Introduction to the Elementary Theory of Z” myself.
Bah! Happy-tensing is for the followers of /tʃɔmskɪ/.
Spinach! The Hat, an open and notorious anti-Chomskyite, is a happy-tenser. As am I. (In any case, He Who Must Not Be Named has a normal LOT=PALM vowel, not THOUGHT.)
The Happy Tenser could be a pub or something.
Tenser, said the tensor.
Tenser, said the tensor.
Tension, apprehension,
And dissension have begun.
I’m surprised Republicans never made an issue of Barack Obama’s suspicious lack of happy-tensing.
I must say that I feel let down.
That is most fervently to be desired. An undescended avocado is no laughing matter. Forty years ago a friend of mine found out he had one when it got entwisticated on an amusement park ride.
True. One should count one’s blessings. (Two.)
@PP, re Delaney: His last match for FCK. Listen at 1:20.
That’s the best approximation to English phonology you get in Danish.
Here is a cute subtitled!) clip where his teammates try to identify a faded photo from his earliest days as a footballer. The name is said at 0:44. (There are lots of discourse and other particles left out from the subtitling, of course, it’s for the hard of hearing, not for you).
@lars
This is excellent. I expected something like DELL-a-nee (same stress as Eriksen). To see how good you are, just compare with when it is the other way round…
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rynmCWr0azE
If the second vowel was still there when open-syllable lengthening struck, length is inevitable in the first vowel…
…except in Switzerland, where open-syllable lengthening never reached. The Big Bad of the Tell story is a Landvogt. Anyone know how he’s pronounced locally…?
Stu: I was immediately imagining someone carrying an avocado on a Ferris wheel. My first thoughts were, why would one take an avocado with them on such a ride? And why wouldn’t it descend, like everything else on the ride?
As the fifth Jewish sage said: “it’s all relative”.
Or as Robin Williams said, If it’s not one thing, it’s your mother. (He speaks surprisingly decent Russian in the leadup to that line.)
@PP, Danes learn English from age 9, and our native phoneme inventory covers English pretty well. Default stress is initial, yes, but there are lots of exceptions. We may not always navigate English orthography very well, but once a Dane hears Delaney with second syllable stress and diphthong, it’s copied like that.
There is lots of phonetic nativization in the pronunciation, a Dane speaking English is rarely hard to spot, but stress and vowels are not the problems. (Now /z/…)
The one that surprised me was the well known chemist* William Labov (not now but a couple of months ago when I first looked him up) . After seeing his name written for several years by Peter T. Daniels I assumed it was said as a British English speaker would expect, i.e. [‘læbɔf], with almost nothing in common with the way he apparently pronounces it himself. The misplaced stress is, of course, characteristic of how British and American speakers pronounce names – mainly foreign names, like Monod, [mnəʊ̯] in American, [‘mɔnəʊ̯] in British, but also some perfectly good English surnames, like Barnett.
Does anyone know the origin of the name Labov? It looks vaguely Russian, but if so the final v should surely be [f] — am I wrong about that?
*I refer to his origins as a chemist because I know it annoys Peter T. Daniels, and what higher aim in life can there be?
The only Rumanian I ever knew well had a Czech name and grew up in a Hungarian-speaking family. He certainly spoke Rumanian and Hungarian (and English) but I don’t think he spoke Czech. He attended a meeting I organized in Visegrád in 1999, and his Hungarian proved to be very valuable. I needed a Hungarian speak to go in the bus on a tour to Budapest. The Hungarians at the meeting were very unhelpful (“we’ve all seen Budapest before, and don’t need to go on a tour”), but Stefan rose to the task, and did it very well.
@Athel
Here is what I was able to find…
Фамилия Лабов зародилась из Лыкошино (Тверская область). В актах поселения Торопец – пильщик Станислав Лабов (1702).
https://nominic.ru/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%9B%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%B2
Фамилия Лаба имеет довольно интересную историю происхождения и По одной из версий, фамилия Лаба образована от литовского слова labas – «благо», «добрый, хороший». Возможно, основатель рода Лаба был приятным в общении или милосердным человеком. Согласно другой гипотезе, в основе этой фамилии лежит польское слово laba – «безделье». В этом случае прозвище Лаба мог получить лентяй. Наконец, нельзя исключить, что эта фамилия связана с эстонским словом laba – «гребок».
Источник: https://names.neolove.ru/last_names/11/la/laba.html © NeoLove.ru
To paraphrase, the name is attested in Stanislav Labov from 1700 in the Tver region, and it looks like Labov comes from a Polish, Baltic or even Estonian laba or labas.
Polish laba-idleness
Lith laba/ labas-good
Est laba-paddle
Thanks. Looking up Lykoshino on the map I see that it’s almost exactly half way between Moscow and St Petersburg.
… which reminds of an incident that occurred on my first visit to Russia, a school trip to Moscow and Leningrad in 1960. We were accompanied by two masters, one of whom spoke Russian well enough for them to understand him, and he could understand them. The other spoke Russian much less well than he thought. We took the train from Moscow to Leningrad and during the journey he had a conversation in my presence with a Russian, who was too polite to say that he didn’t understand a word. The master told him the story about why the line is not completely straight but had a kink in it. The Russian said, that’s very interesting, and then proceeded to tell exactly the same story.
I am glad they didn’t exchange stories about why Russia uses a wider gauge than Europe.
he had a conversation in my presence with a Russian, who was too polite to say that he didn’t understand a word
Perhaps the Russian thought he was being addressed by one of those crazy Hungarians in his own language, and preserved a judicious (not to say fearful) silence.
Возможно, основатель рода Лаба был приятным в общении или милосердным человеком.
Or he just had a habit of saying labas rytas/laba diena/labas vakaras/labanaktis ‘good morning/afternoon, etc’
Language Hat: that was creepy. (you quoting The Demolished Man). In the Bulgarian translation that paragraph was typeset as a spiral.
“Tenser, said the tensor.”
What is it in Bulgarian?
My copy (of the Bulgarian translation of The Demolished Man) is in another city and in an apartment that is currently being renovated, unfortunately.
Actually no, I found the book, but I’ll have to read the whole book to find the phrase. I think it was somewhere near the end? I might just read it again in Bulgarian until I encounter the phrase, it’s not too long.
It’s “Дай зор с този тензор.”
Sorry for triple posting, but I just found it before the edit timer expired: it’s “Дай зор с този тензор.” — “зор” and “тензор” rhyme, a good translation I think. I don’t know how to translate “зор”, though — “urgency”? “Give it urgency with that tensor”?
“Зор” is a noun and “tense” an adjective, but “дай зор” means “give it urgency / it is tense”.
Yes, I like that — thanks for taking the trouble to find it!
I’m surprised Republicans never made an issue of Barack Obama’s suspicious lack of happy-tensing.
Nor of [dʒɪmɪ k(j)ɑtə]’s, either. Not everything is politicized.
I’m a little surprised that Israeli Roni Katzir’s name is written with an [r]. I’d expect the two r’s to be [ʀ].
As far as I could tell from Wikipedia’s descriptions of Hebrew phonology, Standard Hebrew would indeed put a straight [r] in there, while Modern Hebrew would probably use [ʁ̞] or something very similar.
(The pronunciation used by Roni Katzir personally would probably depend on their ethnic and cultural background, which I don’t know enough about to comment; the name is generic Israeli, of the kind that get adopted at immigration, so says nothing about his origin.)
However, by morphic resonance, avocado means “testicle.”
Indeed; a natural metaphor given the fruit’s shape, especially if (as seems likely) the 16th century version would have been much smaller than the modern ones.
(The translation usually given as confirmation actually literally means “companion”, but AFAICT there are other sources supporting the body part meaning.)
Russian, of course, compares the body part in question with eggs instead, and English with nuts – which are, if anything, a bit smaller than that.
Colloquial German goes with Russian here.
JfoM: I’d assumed he was Ashkenazi, maybe because Israel’s most famous brothers Katzir were formerly Kachalsky: both were professors; Aharon died in a terrorist attack, and Ephraim later served as the Israeli president. I wouldn’t be surprised if Roni is related. But as you say, you can’t tell.
Mizrahis and Sephardis use [ʀ]~[ʁ] more often these days, even some who still retain some [ħ] and [ʕ].
The pronunciation of Trudgill [tɹˈʌdɡˌɪl] reflects its origin from Threadgold.
Where does the convention come from of marking an accent before the syllable nucleus? IPA marks it before the onset.
@Y : Gouskova herself, who says “I mark stresses before the stressed vowels because life is too short to try to figure out the syllabification in some of these names”
It seems pretty common in German, with the express (and greatly exaggerated) justification that syllable boundaries are hard.
TIL: George Lakoff is pronounced LAY-koff. I wouldn’t have guessed. Same for Robin Lakoff, obviously.
TIL: George Lakoff is pronounced LAY-koff.
I can’t imagine any other pronunciation. But then I’m old enough to have learned it from his contemporaries.
Me too. I certainly heard about him in the early ’70s if not before.
And now I’m wondering about the origin of his name. The Wikipedia article doesn’t have a biography section!
Oh, come on.
The pronunciation of Lakoff matches (in stress pattern and vowels) that of other Ashkenazic-American surnames ranging from that of the Hon. Jed Rakoff (a federal judge in Manhattan) to that of the Not-So-Hon. Bernie Madoff (a convicted fraudster). Which is some evidence that it should be unsurprising. Are there other Ashkenazic-American surnames of the pattern [CONSONANT]a[CONSONANT]off that are pronounced differently (in an AmEng context)?
I guess going back to the very beginning of the thread, Labov would be an exception to the pattern I just noted if it were spelled Laboff … But it’s not.
Not a linguist, but the veteran British rock and roller Chris Dreja (of the Yardbirds) just reposed at age 79 and I realized that I was not actually confident my understanding of the pronunciation of his surname was accurate. So I found a few interviews on the internet where … well of course interviewees often don’t utter their own name, but he at least acquiesced in a pronunciation by the interviewers that was what I had supposed, with the “j” as /j/ rather than /dʒ/ or some third thing. His father apparently had the rather un-English name Alojzy Baltazar Dreja, and had been one of the exiled Polish airmen who during WW2 flew missions out of English airfields in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No._300_Polish_Bomber_Squadron and then stayed in the U.K. after 1945 because there was no free Poland to return to. But the surname was probably less of a challenge in English mouths than some other Polish surnames might have been.
He’s pronounced like he made off with other people’s money (which he famously did)? That’s too good to be true.
Comedian Simon Rakoff is pronounced “RACK-off”, but perhaps he doesn’t count since he’s Ashkenazic-Canadian instead of Ashkenazic-American? How about his brother David Rakoff, who became an American citizen?
According to somebody using Bernie Madoff as a genealogical case study, his paternal grandfather was born in (what’s now) Poland with the surname Miodownik, meaning “honey cake” or something related to honey, and Americanized it to Madoff upon immigration in 1908.
“Pshedborsh” for “Przedborz” in that Madoff-tracing piece ktschwarz linked is delightful. I can’t speak to Canadian Rakoffs, other than to note that the FACE vowel in Judge Rakoff’s surname probably did not come straight from the old country but reflects Americanization and not all families who imported the same surname will have gone the same distance down that path. Although the Canadian approach is probably not authentic old-country either since as best I can tell from a quick check of references neither Yiddish nor Polish have /æ/ in their inventory of vowels and Russian does only occurring between palatalized consonants which would not be the case here.
@ktschwarz: That Wikipedia article for David Rackoff includes this peculiar sentence about his parents:
What, I wonder, was the reason for describing their practices in such different ways? Was it temporal—”has practised” denoting that Gina had been a psychiatrist, but switched to another area of medicine? Did it indicate that psychiatry was only part (maybe a minor part) of her practice? Lots of doctors can have multiple specialties. One of my father’s close colleagues—both my father and her being board-certified pediatricians—was also a board-certified allergist, although that was definitely the minority of her practice. Or does it snobbishly denote that only Vivian was board certified in psychiatry?
From an article published shortly after David R. died: ‘“He recorded the thing with his last breath,” his father, Dr. Vivian Rakoff, a noted psychiatrist, said in an interview he and his wife Dr. Gina Shochat-Rakoff, a physician, gave The Times of Israel at their Toronto home.’ So no specialty noted for the mother, but “physician” contrasted with “psychiatrist.” It’s even weirder because it seems in context like gratuitous credentialism — the parents’ day jobs were not really of any obvious relevance to what they have to say about their dead son and his writing.
FWIW, I think of “psychotherapist” as presumptively someone who does not have an M.D. as such, since the label “psychiatrist” is claimed by the credentialism-enforcement authorities to be a subset of the M.D. world but psychotherapist is usefully vaguer.
ETA: I just checked the online self-presentation of three people I know from college who are in the therapy profession. The two whose regulatory credential is LCSW* use the self-descriptor “psychotherapist.” The one with a Psy.D. (but not an M.D.) uses the self-descriptor “clinical psychologist.” Perhaps the LCSW folks cannot present themselves as “psychologists” as a matter of New York licensing law?
*=Licensed Clinical Social Worker
Yes: I don’t know about the US, but certainly in the UK, a (medical) doctor who practises psychotherapy would not necessarily be a psychiatrist. I would imagine that there are GPs who practise psychotherapy, for example. In the UK, “psychiatrist” would imply a (usually) hospital-based consultant who was a member of the relevant professional college, or someone in training to become such. You would be liable to prosecution for calling yourself a “psychiatrist” if you weren’t part of the elect.
(This is about informed consent, essentially: in principle, a surgeon, say, has no legally privileged position when it comes to sticking knives into people with their consent, and anyone else could legally do the same. But misrepresenting your professional qualifications means that the consent has been obtained under false pretences, and what you have done is therefore assault, no matter how willing your victim.)
Psychotherapy, on the other hand, is essentially unregulated in the UK:
https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/statutory-regulation-of-psychotherapists-and-counsellors-challenges-and-considerations
@J.W. Brewer: In at least some jurisdictions, a psychologist does need to have a doctorate. That might at one point have been restricted to a Ph. D. in the field of psychology, but I think a broader constellation of degrees (like Psy. D.—although I don’t know to what extent that is meaningfully different from a Ph. D. in clinical psychology) are generally accepted now. I have a family friend, who has counseled a couple of my kids, who is a Ph. D. psychologist but who doesn’t normally use that terminology.* I can’t actually remember right now what her preferred term actually is though. I’ve known people in recent years who used counselor, therapist, and psychotherapist, at least.
@David Eddyshaw: Few psychiatrists are based in hospitals here, but permanent positions based entirely at hospitals are a small minority of doctors in virtually all specialties (except things like emergency medicine). It is, however, very common for a doctor’s office to be located very close (like, across the parking lot) from the hospital where they send their inpatients.
In any case, a psychiatrist here is a physician who specializes** in treating psychiatric conditions. Most doctors who would call themselves that are, I am fairly sure, board certified in the specialty (having done a residency, or equivalent, in it, then practiced in the specialty for a couple years), but I don’t think that’s legally a requirement to use the term,*** just a norm of the medical profession. I suspect that the reason Gina Shochat-Rakoff was referred to the way she was is a combination of several factors. She was probably not board certified in psychology, did not refer to herself as a “psychologist,” and did not practice exclusively (or even probably primarily) in that area.
* Thinking about it, her not using psychologist may have to do with that fact that she rents space in a building owned by her parents. And her mother, who has the nicest office there, is also a therapist, but I don’t think she has a doctorate. So maybe the daughter doesn’t want to look like she’s trying to outshine her mother.
** That it refers to a specialist is important here. Essentially every physician treats mental health issues some of the time. General practitioners write a lot of scrip for antidepressants.
*** I could certainly be wrong about this, in some jurisdictions, and at more recent points in time than when I was actively hanging around with psychiatrist physicians.
She’s Canadian, that sentence seems to have been taken from a Canadian source that has since disappeared from the web, and spelling the verb “practise” is a bit of a shibboleth — see CANADIAN SPELLING at Language Hat.
If Wikipedia needs to split the hair of spelling in a page on a Canadian-born naturalized American, I suppose it would probably fall on the American side, but evidently nobody has enforced that.
David Rakoff’s father’s father was from “Latvia and Lithuania”, it says here, or Belarus, it says here.
In the UK, “psychiatrist” would imply a (usually) hospital-based consultant who was a member of the relevant professional college, or someone in training to become such. You would be liable to prosecution for calling yourself a “psychiatrist” if you weren’t part of the elect.
NZ has essentially the same system. I understood a “Psychiatrist” to be licensed to prescribe [**] psycho-active medicines; they must therefore be MDs/competent to assess the patient’s physical condition and/or other medications they’re taking that might interact with the psyche ones.
Yes they’re usually hospital-based but also usually run a private practice, which might include some element of psychotherapy.
And similarly to UK, “Psychotherapist” can mean almost anything.
[**] including being licensed to prescribe medicines despite the patient’s lack of consent.
Per Wikitree, at least some American Lakoffs go back to a Luxembourgish family Lacave.
I think in the U.S. “psychotherapist” carries some implicature that one holds some sort of relevant professional license, although there might (depending on the state) be four or five or six different potential licenses that would all fit the vague “psychotherapy” context, each fitting a more precisely-defined-and-regulated “profession.”* It might be legally hazardous (though I’m not certain and the degree of risk might well vary by state) to hold yourself out as a “psychotherapist” without any such license even though there is nothing labeled a “psychotherapist” license as such.* Probably safer to use an even vaguer word like “counselor” (which may, however, in some states still be taken to imply licensure) or, even better, “life coach” or “spiritual director”** or something.
*There are (with a lot of state-to-state variation) lots of licensed professions. Being licensed as e.g. a landscape architect or massage therapist would be outside the usual scope of “psychotherapist.”
**That last one does have a fairly definite meaning in certain religious traditions, but in the U.S. the secular authorities are not going to enforce compliance with those traditions even on a consumer-protection theory.