CHICKEN CHICKEN.

May 16, 2007 by 37 Comments

Chicken chicken chicken chicken, chicken chicken (chicken chicken chicken); chicken chicken chicken chicken: chicken! (Chicken chicken.)

Comments

  1. Kári Tulinius says
    May 16, 2007 at 10:15 am

    Chicken chicken chicken “chicken,” “chicken” chicken “chicken.” Chicken chicken chicken “chicken chicken chicken chicken chicken chicken chicken” [Chicken Chicken, 1893]. Chicken chicken chicken chicken. Chicken chicken chicken chicken chicken; chicken chicken chicken, chicken chicken chicken chicken, chicken chicken chicken, chicken: chicken, chicken, chicken, chicken, chicken—chicken chicken chicken chicken chicken chicken petunia.

  2. Cliff Crawford says
    May 16, 2007 at 10:39 am

    Duck?

  3. Justin the Mad Latinist says
    May 16, 2007 at 10:45 am

    > Chicken chicken chicken “chicken,” “chicken” chicken “chicken.”
    Chicken! Chicken chicken chicken CHICKEN! Chicken Chicken Chicken! Chicken chiken chicken chicken, Chicken Chicken Chicken Chicken 9.36.28:

    Gallus, Galle, gallum gallum gallus gallo gallus, gallus gallus gallos gallus gallus—gallus gallus—gallus.
    Chicken: chicken chicken chicken chicken chicken chicken, chicken chicken chicken chicken chicken chicken—chicken chicken.

    Chicken?

  4. zhoen says
    May 16, 2007 at 11:15 am

    Chick. En.

  5. Ran says
    May 16, 2007 at 12:05 pm

    Rooster?

  6. John Cowan says
    May 16, 2007 at 12:13 pm

    Chicken.

  7. Siganus Sutor says
    May 16, 2007 at 12:17 pm

    Time to talk turkey now:
    Rhubarb rhubarb “Rhubarb Rhubarb”? Rhubarb rhubarb-rhubarb, rhubarb! Rhubarb, rhubarb Rhubarb…

  8. Sonja says
    May 16, 2007 at 12:58 pm

    Chicken chicken chicken chicken chicken chicken. Chicken chicken? Chicken.

  9. dearieme says
    May 16, 2007 at 1:57 pm

    When you ask an Aussie how bush tucker tastes, he answers “like chicken”. Or “chook”.

  10. grijl says
    May 16, 2007 at 2:29 pm

    kurichnego kurichnego kurichnego impereilizm !

  11. Ben Zimmer says
    May 16, 2007 at 2:31 pm

    Malkovich Malkovich Malkovich Malkovich! (Malkovich.)

  12. Ben Zimmer says
    May 16, 2007 at 2:34 pm

    Mun, mun mun mun. Mun mun. Mun, mun?

  13. Sili says
    May 16, 2007 at 3:21 pm

    Duck duck goose?

  14. Cliff Crawford says
    May 16, 2007 at 3:23 pm

    And while we’re at it, Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.

  15. Sili says
    May 16, 2007 at 3:48 pm

    On second schtroumpf, schtroumpf that schtroumpf. That is, Les Schtroumpf schtroumpfed of this first.
    For our schtroumpfish schtroumpf: “Smølf”.
    A schtroumpf could be: “Den smølf smølfede ham lige i smølfen.”

  16. bulbul says
    May 16, 2007 at 5:31 pm

    Speaker A: Vy ste všetci toto. Keby ste sa netoto a radšej zatoto, tak by sme to toto už dávno vytoto a nemuseli by sme sa natoto jak takí toto. Ale vy radšej vytoto a roztoto a nie aby ste celý toto poriadne toto a toto.
    Speaker B: Ale šak sa netoto. Dneska zatoto a zajtra to celé toto bude vytoto až sa z toho všetci toto pototo.
    Note: that’s a reasonably accurate transcript of a real conversation.
    In case of emergency, replace “toto” by “jebať”. Works just as well in most cases.

  17. Jangari says
    May 16, 2007 at 8:00 pm

    To represent the antipodean element:
    Wilik-wilik, wilik-wilik wilik-wilik “Wilik-wilik” wilik-wilik.
    Wilik-wilik wilik-wilik Wilik-wilik wilik-wilik wilik-wilik wilik-wilik. Wilik-wilik wilik.
    -Wilik wilik.
    That’s what a galah sounds like!

  18. Jordan says
    May 16, 2007 at 8:38 pm

    Cheeky.

  19. Mark S. says
    May 16, 2007 at 8:43 pm

    Shi shi shi shi shi shi shi….
    But I think Steve Martin said it best: “Hup hup hup hup hup hup hup hup hup hup hup.”

  20. John Emerson says
    May 16, 2007 at 9:05 pm

    Dead link. Most frustrating post ever.

  21. John Emerson says
    May 16, 2007 at 9:50 pm

    OK, got through. I’m fine now.

  22. Noetica says
    May 16, 2007 at 10:14 pm

    Chic, Ken! (Ken ye chicks?)

  23. stercus says
    May 16, 2007 at 10:45 pm

    cluck!

  24. KCinDC says
    May 17, 2007 at 12:37 am

    Reagan Reagan Reagan Reagan Reagan.

  25. Jangari says
    May 17, 2007 at 4:01 am

    I can’t let this go without alluding to that classic Monty Python sketch:
    Don’t worry dear, I’ll have your spam, I love it. I’m having the spam spam spam spam spam spam baked beans spam spam and spam!
    Baked beans are off!
    Oh, can I have spam instead?
    You mean you want spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam and spam?! Blechhh!

  26. gijsd says
    May 17, 2007 at 6:39 am

    Why not let the bird speak for itself? A sparrow for example.
    DE MUS
    Tjielp tjielp – tjielp tjielp tjielp
    tjielp tjielp tjielp – tjielp tjielp
    tjielp tjielp tjielp tjielp tjielp tjielp
    tjielp tjielp tjielp
    Tjielp
    etc.
    (c) Jan Hanlo, 1954
    http://www.muurgedichten.nl/hanlo.html

  27. Gary says
    May 17, 2007 at 6:52 am

    This is just a cheap ripoff of the old badger loop:
    http://www.weebls-stuff.com/toons/badgers/

  28. Dave says
    May 17, 2007 at 12:19 pm

    Badgers Badgers Badgers Badgers Badgers Badgers Badgers Badgers Badgers Badgers Badgers Badgers mushrooms, MUSHROOMS!

  29. SN says
    May 17, 2007 at 1:56 pm

    Developers, developers, developers!

  30. vanya says
    May 18, 2007 at 3:50 am

    Pollo kuritsa huhn kur koko. Gallus házityúk dajaaj kana poulet. Ayam hohn niwatori höns, “galinha” tavuk kokoshka yi ji.

  31. DanW says
    May 18, 2007 at 10:59 am

    CHICKEN! EGG! CHICKEN! EGG! CHICKEN! EGG! CHICKEN! EGG! CHICKEN! EGG! CHICKEN! EGG! CHICKEN! EGG! CHICKEN! EGG! CHICKEN! EGG! CHICKEN! EGG! CHICKEN! EGG! CHICKEN! EGG! CHICKEN! EGG! CHICKEN! EGG! CHICKEN! EGG! CHICKEN! EGG! CHICKEN! EGG! CHICKEN! EGG!
    Now, what did I start with again?

  32. Teju says
    May 18, 2007 at 12:57 pm

    Adiye.

  33. L.A. says
    May 18, 2007 at 6:53 pm

    Huhn huhn huhn huhn huehnchen huehnchen huhn huhn huhn.
    huhn
    nhuh
    hnhu
    uhnh
    huhn!

  34. Justin the Mad Latinist says
    May 19, 2007 at 4:33 pm

    YOu know, Wilsonart’s post almost actually fits 😉

  35. David Marjanović says
    May 19, 2007 at 5:41 pm

    Should I resist?
    Naaah…
    Wenn Fliegen hinter Fliegen fliegen, fliegen Fliegen Fliegen nach.

  36. Ryan says
    May 20, 2007 at 3:37 am

    In a certain dialect of Finnish (Rauma) the following works: Kokko, kokko kokko koko kokko. ‘Kokko, bring together the whole bonfire!’

  37. David Marjanović says
    May 21, 2007 at 7:02 am

    ARGH! A tongue-twister with long and short consonants! (Or is koko a typo?)

Speak Your Mind

*